The Piano in Art
I was looking for eye candy for this retro-published review of Håvard Gimse’s second volume of Sibelius’ Piano music recorded by Naxos, when I came across this blog post at The Collaborative Piano Blog.
The post directs the reader to an eclectic collection of paintings featuring pianos and pianists, compiled by Bruno Dillen, on Art in the Picture.
The painting featured in this post is Schubert at the Piano, painted in 1899 by Gustav Klimt. Check out the link and you can click on the various tags at the bottom of the page(s) to find other paintings featuring other instruments.
Sibelius admitted that the piano did not really work for him. In 1937 he said to his pupil Bengt von Törne: “I write piano pieces in my spare moments … as a matter of fact the piano does not interest me because it cannot sing.”
A very strange remark, to be honest. The piano cannot sing? But if you ask me, it’s because in Sibelius’ music, “singing” is not the song of human voice, but rather the “singing” that comes from nature – the arias of winds, the pedal hum of mountains, the faint birdsong and underlying breathing of Tapio’s forests, the hymns of rotating planets. The piano, it seems, had never had a voice as suited to portraying nature compared to say, the flute or any of the bowed strings.
For similar reasons, Sibelius rarely used any percussion instrument in his orchestral works. Only the timpani is a regular. If he used something rare, it was often to great effect, such as the single cosmic - gong - of the tamtam in The Bard.
In any case, a handful of pianists supported Sibelius’ piano works. Among them was the famous pianist Glenn Gould:
Sibelius never wrote against the grain of the keyboard. … In Sibelius’s piano music everything works, everything sings – but on its own terms. … Sibelius was able to make a significant addition to the far too limited piano repertoire of late Romanticism.
I got that quote off of the very important Sibelius reference on the web that is Sibelius.fi. The article also makes the comment that “those who have found fault with Sibelius’ piano music have usually been music writers or critics. ” A point that I noticed early in my championing of Sibelius’ music, including his piano works, which I agree with.
Luckily, I am neither a music writer nor a critic. I’m an Inkpot Sibelius Nutcase.
Related posts:
Jean Sibelius
I have traversed the forests of Tapio, I have heard tales from Kullervo's blade. I have scored the chorus of tempests, and transcribed the scent of drying hemp into song. I have caressed the smooth shell of Luonnotar's egg, and I have wept farewell for Runeberg's bard.

This blog belongs to the Inkpot Sibelius Nutcase. He writes about the Finnish composer, Jean Sibelius.The Dust of Hue on Twitter
- Why so many conducting Finns? http://t.co/U5TTDGK9 02:16:00 PM May 11, 2012
- RT @ABCClassic: Ever wondered just what a conductor does? Fascinating video from @NYTimes. http://t.co/uN5P6msD 06:02:24 AM April 16, 2012
- Which is the best musical instrument? http://t.co/WMgrV7eU 06:00:56 AM April 16, 2012
Categories
Tags
Aino art Berglund BIS butterfly featured Finland Finlandia Flying Inkpot Helsinki Inkpot Sibelius Nutcase intermezzo Kalevi Aho Karelia karelia suite Kavakos Kullervo kuolema Lahti Symphony Orchestra nature Okko Kamu Ondine organicism Osmo Vänskä ossia piano programme notes Prospero Romantic style Shakespeare Sibelius Singapore Symphony Orchestra symphonic fantasy symphony cycle Symphony No.1 Symphony no.4 Symphony No.5 Symphony No.7 Symphony No.8 Tapiola Tempest The Philharmonic Orchestra tone poem Viipuri violin concertoPopular Posts
- Tapiola 15 comment(s) | posted on April 22, 1999
- The Violin Concerto 10 comment(s) | posted on March 30, 1998
- Kullervo 9 comment(s) | posted on June 27, 1997
- Dust of Hue 5 comment(s) | posted on March 10, 2010
- Sibelius: The First Symphony 4 comment(s) | posted on January 6, 1999
- Complete Sibelius Symphonies: Paavo Berglund’s 1972-74 Bournemouth Cycle 4 comment(s) | posted on August 3, 1999







